I recently wrote a post for Andy's Goode Life and you can check it out here.
I haven't tried my hand at fiction writing in a while and all her kind words have really inspired me. These are some of the nicest comments I have received about anything I've done to date.
So...
Thank you!
Friday, June 12, 2009
My Really Goode Video
Well folks. It is up. My ridiculous video application for Murphy-Goode's Really Goode Job is live for the world to see. Shot in about an hour including teaching my wonderful girlfriend how to use the camera (thanks for putting up with me)! Another hour to cut it together and voila! I know about the spelling error on the last title card. I think I am going to play it off as "tiwtter" is a cool new site y'all haven't even heard of yet. Anyway, check it out and please vote for it here!
Thanks for your support!
Shaun
Thanks for your support!
Shaun
Thursday, June 11, 2009
A Really Goode Job Description
Anyone can say they have a really good job. Hell, just having a job these days is really good, but how many people can say they have a really goode job? If you didn’t catch what I did there, I added an ‘e’ to the end of the word to make it better (much like a shoppe is like a shop, but more expensive).
Well, Murphy-Goode Winery is offering just such a really goode job. It is a six-month gig blogging, networking, and producing web videos to expand the brand’s social network presence. Did I mention that the job pays $10,000 a month? Not bad, eh? Then you ask, how can I get in on that loot?
Well, you make a video, of course. Then you get all your friends to visit the site and vote on your video. Neat huh? The best video wins the really goode job.
Here’s the fun part! This job isn’t worth $60,000 to the company. Any Joe with a facebook page can be a social networker. The only qualification for such a position is generally to be a nice person (harder than it seems to find sometimes). And, as soon as the six-month carnival in dreamland is over Joe will be hired at a much more reasonable salary and life will go on just as it always has.
You see, the $60,000 is not for six months of work. It is for three months of craziness that this application process creates. It is a similar to the principals of a sweepstakes. The hullabaloo generates at least $60,000 worth of brand awareness if not more. If you think of it this way, Murphy Goode is getting six months of work out of someone for free!
You may remember when Tourism Queensland used a similar strategy to find a new web 2.0 guru and promote its brand through a worldwide video contest. I can only hope that this sort of scheme catches on. It appears to be greatly beneficial to the company and it gives some poor sap steady income for half a year.
I would also like to point out that this game makes friends with the web 2.0 community, which has been known to have the power to lift an entity from obscurity to stardom, but also to rip to shreds anything it might deem unwelcome. I would say anytime an organization decides to embrace this community and even try to cater to it is a really goode thing.
So, I just read through this post again and realized how horribly cynical I come off. I would just like to make it absolutely clear that any cynicism is born entirely from jealousy. I would also like it to be known that I totally made a video last night and submitted my application. Who wouldn’t want to be that “poor sap” if only for six months?
Well, Murphy-Goode Winery is offering just such a really goode job. It is a six-month gig blogging, networking, and producing web videos to expand the brand’s social network presence. Did I mention that the job pays $10,000 a month? Not bad, eh? Then you ask, how can I get in on that loot?
Well, you make a video, of course. Then you get all your friends to visit the site and vote on your video. Neat huh? The best video wins the really goode job.
Here’s the fun part! This job isn’t worth $60,000 to the company. Any Joe with a facebook page can be a social networker. The only qualification for such a position is generally to be a nice person (harder than it seems to find sometimes). And, as soon as the six-month carnival in dreamland is over Joe will be hired at a much more reasonable salary and life will go on just as it always has.
You see, the $60,000 is not for six months of work. It is for three months of craziness that this application process creates. It is a similar to the principals of a sweepstakes. The hullabaloo generates at least $60,000 worth of brand awareness if not more. If you think of it this way, Murphy Goode is getting six months of work out of someone for free!
You may remember when Tourism Queensland used a similar strategy to find a new web 2.0 guru and promote its brand through a worldwide video contest. I can only hope that this sort of scheme catches on. It appears to be greatly beneficial to the company and it gives some poor sap steady income for half a year.
I would also like to point out that this game makes friends with the web 2.0 community, which has been known to have the power to lift an entity from obscurity to stardom, but also to rip to shreds anything it might deem unwelcome. I would say anytime an organization decides to embrace this community and even try to cater to it is a really goode thing.
So, I just read through this post again and realized how horribly cynical I come off. I would just like to make it absolutely clear that any cynicism is born entirely from jealousy. I would also like it to be known that I totally made a video last night and submitted my application. Who wouldn’t want to be that “poor sap” if only for six months?
I feel bad, ok!
I know I haven't posted in quite a while, but the gears are turning in the old noggin and I have some plans for my blog's future. Stay tuned!
...please
-Shaun
...please
-Shaun
Saturday, April 18, 2009
What to do with all of this???
I got this very kind message on my Facebook the other day and I thought it was worth answering here on the blog.
The question is, what do I do with this huge social network once I have acquired it?
First off, Katie proposes a fantastic solution to the question. Send a message to your 400 Facebook friends or post a status update that would refer them all to your gym and you are in the money, provided that they remember to drop your name. I love it!
Social media marketing works in the same way. Amass a large network of personal connections and profit from them. As far as I know, Katie is not a small business or a large corporation trying to sell some outstanding product to as many people as possible so gym membership referrals might sound like a good idea, but there are certainly other things that can be accomplished by a large social network on the web.
My favorite solution is somewhat selfless. Let's say Katie needs signatures on a petition or wants to raise awareness for a cause. A large, online, social network can be the perfect place to get people participating. As long as Katie has maintained strong personal relationships with her online communities they are certainly more likely to listen. It is much easier and more effective than soliciting to strangers on the street.
Big brands are certainly not the only ones benefiting from large online social networks. Much can be accomplished by little people with lots of friends. The key word here is, of course, FRIENDS.
Creating huge social networks without any personal interaction is absolutely useless! I can't stress that enough, especially if you are not big brand, which people expect to sell them stuff. It is in the individual's best interest (as well as the big brand, if you are listening) to keep personal relationships his/her highest priority. A 'Facebook friend' should be no different from a 'friend' and communication should be kept open. You never know when you might need your 400 Facebookers or 3000 Twitterers or whatever connections you have.
Be a nice person and interact with other nice people as much as possible. You will need them eventually and, certainly, they will need you!
The question is, what do I do with this huge social network once I have acquired it?
First off, Katie proposes a fantastic solution to the question. Send a message to your 400 Facebook friends or post a status update that would refer them all to your gym and you are in the money, provided that they remember to drop your name. I love it!
Social media marketing works in the same way. Amass a large network of personal connections and profit from them. As far as I know, Katie is not a small business or a large corporation trying to sell some outstanding product to as many people as possible so gym membership referrals might sound like a good idea, but there are certainly other things that can be accomplished by a large social network on the web.
My favorite solution is somewhat selfless. Let's say Katie needs signatures on a petition or wants to raise awareness for a cause. A large, online, social network can be the perfect place to get people participating. As long as Katie has maintained strong personal relationships with her online communities they are certainly more likely to listen. It is much easier and more effective than soliciting to strangers on the street.
Big brands are certainly not the only ones benefiting from large online social networks. Much can be accomplished by little people with lots of friends. The key word here is, of course, FRIENDS.
Creating huge social networks without any personal interaction is absolutely useless! I can't stress that enough, especially if you are not big brand, which people expect to sell them stuff. It is in the individual's best interest (as well as the big brand, if you are listening) to keep personal relationships his/her highest priority. A 'Facebook friend' should be no different from a 'friend' and communication should be kept open. You never know when you might need your 400 Facebookers or 3000 Twitterers or whatever connections you have.
Be a nice person and interact with other nice people as much as possible. You will need them eventually and, certainly, they will need you!
Monday, April 13, 2009
Facebook: When To Post Your Big Announcement
Facebook is obviously a really fantastic way to connect to people and with its ever-growing population the connections can get numerous indeed. It is important to use those connections to their utmost potential. The idea, of course, is to get people talking about you as much as possible and it is looking like, timing matters. People Facebook (as a verb) more at some times than at others and capitalizing on those peak moments could mean the difference between selling one widget and selling one hundred.
First, let's talk about good Facebook practice. Facebook can be a complicated beast with many different ways to interact with people. However, some methods can be more effective than others. The News Feed feature is the bread and butter of Facebook these days. It is the first thing you see after login and provides easy navigation through all the updates that concern you. Ideally, you should be updating your profile daily* just to show up on your friends' and fans' news feeds. Notice that I asterixed the hell out of "daily." Updates are helpful, provided you have something interesting to share. Too many updates on what you ate for breakfast will quickly become "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" and when you post "The Wolf" no one will listen. I would rather miss a day of updates than write crap in my status bar.
Great! Now you have some big news you want to share with the world! You want to get people talking about it, clicking through to your website, pushing it on their friends, etc. Awesome! Who doesn't? It turns out there are specific times durring the week that Facebookers seem to be more active. Mid-week (Wednesday to be exact) sees much more activity than any other day. These are not people "checking their Facebook." This is when they are responding to posts, giving thumbs up to status changes, writing on walls, interacting on every level. You want to get on as many peoples' news feeds as possible early in the day (Tuesday evening if possible) and spend the entire day responding to posts, clarifying details, driving traffic, etc. Facebook can easily be run on autopilot most of the time, but if you know that there is going to be a surge in user interaction on a particular day it is certainly a good idea to provide personal feedback and communication.
With more and more social network communities popping up on the web, no one can be expected to devote all of their time to one such as Facebook, but capitalizing on the one day per week that users are at their most interactive can be an extremely valuable use of time.
**A weekly breakdown of online social network activity.
First, let's talk about good Facebook practice. Facebook can be a complicated beast with many different ways to interact with people. However, some methods can be more effective than others. The News Feed feature is the bread and butter of Facebook these days. It is the first thing you see after login and provides easy navigation through all the updates that concern you. Ideally, you should be updating your profile daily* just to show up on your friends' and fans' news feeds. Notice that I asterixed the hell out of "daily." Updates are helpful, provided you have something interesting to share. Too many updates on what you ate for breakfast will quickly become "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" and when you post "The Wolf" no one will listen. I would rather miss a day of updates than write crap in my status bar.
Great! Now you have some big news you want to share with the world! You want to get people talking about it, clicking through to your website, pushing it on their friends, etc. Awesome! Who doesn't? It turns out there are specific times durring the week that Facebookers seem to be more active. Mid-week (Wednesday to be exact) sees much more activity than any other day. These are not people "checking their Facebook." This is when they are responding to posts, giving thumbs up to status changes, writing on walls, interacting on every level. You want to get on as many peoples' news feeds as possible early in the day (Tuesday evening if possible) and spend the entire day responding to posts, clarifying details, driving traffic, etc. Facebook can easily be run on autopilot most of the time, but if you know that there is going to be a surge in user interaction on a particular day it is certainly a good idea to provide personal feedback and communication.
With more and more social network communities popping up on the web, no one can be expected to devote all of their time to one such as Facebook, but capitalizing on the one day per week that users are at their most interactive can be an extremely valuable use of time.
**A weekly breakdown of online social network activity.
Monday, April 6, 2009
Friday, April 3
- Facebook: No activity
- Twitter: 4 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Friday, April 3, 2009
Thursday, April 2
- Facebook: 1 status comment, 2 wall posts
- Twitter: 3 new followers
- StumbleUpon: 1 new subscriber
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Wednesday, April 1
- Facebook: 4 wall posts
- Twitter: 4 new followers
- StumbleUpon: 1 new subscriber
If the bubble bursts will we find ourselves in a Twitter recession?
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Tuesday, March 31
- Facebook: 2 status comments, 1 photo comment
- Twitter: 5 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No Activity
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Monday, March 30
- Facebook: 3 wall posts
- Twitter: 2 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Monday, March 30, 2009
Phase IV
Here we go. The final week of the experiment. I will be stepping it up this week with a whopping five tweets, follow five new people, subscribe to five new stumblers, review five new websites, and as always, update my Facebook profile. Thanks for staying with me, it seems to be working out as expected with some pretty staggering returns. Five updates per day is quite a bit. The work during Phase III was pretty hectic as it was with three. It is certainly a full-time job. I find this unbelievably exciting. This is a job that didn't exist five years ago.
So, who fills this position. You knew these kids in high school. I will call them the "social nerd." You know, that hipster-type that happens to be really interesting and funny and people seem to hang on their every word, but happen to have some knowledge of technology. "Knowledge" might not be the right word. Let's use "love." I know, it is a strong word, but how else do you describe it. It is not that they are 100% computer nerds, but they get excited about a new piece of software, or a new way to use a new technology. I use "new" a lot, but you know these are the kind of people who claim that the original Nintendo is the greatest system of all time. The throw-back is important. Maybe that is how they use the nerdyness to relate to people. Let's get back to the concept of "new" and I will go ahead and separate that term from "cutting-edge." It is not on the social nerd to necessarily develop the next big technology, but to use it in a new way. Facebook is a good example; a true social network meant to connect people to eachother. It seems like a simple step, but a profound one to use it to connect businesses to the users. Let me explain the "how" and "why" this works in one sentence. And please quote the hell out of me.
"The business is a user."
You all have a Facebook account, most of you have a Twitter account, even some of you use StumbleUpon (in the "correct" way) and you know what they are for and how to use them. It is NO different if you are doing it from the perspective of a giant corporation. That is why it works. Pretend the corporation is a person who talks the same way a person talks. People don't want to connect to big businesses, they want to connect to people who have something interesting to say. The social network presence of the business is then concentrated into one position, one person, one social nerd.
So, who fills this position. You knew these kids in high school. I will call them the "social nerd." You know, that hipster-type that happens to be really interesting and funny and people seem to hang on their every word, but happen to have some knowledge of technology. "Knowledge" might not be the right word. Let's use "love." I know, it is a strong word, but how else do you describe it. It is not that they are 100% computer nerds, but they get excited about a new piece of software, or a new way to use a new technology. I use "new" a lot, but you know these are the kind of people who claim that the original Nintendo is the greatest system of all time. The throw-back is important. Maybe that is how they use the nerdyness to relate to people. Let's get back to the concept of "new" and I will go ahead and separate that term from "cutting-edge." It is not on the social nerd to necessarily develop the next big technology, but to use it in a new way. Facebook is a good example; a true social network meant to connect people to eachother. It seems like a simple step, but a profound one to use it to connect businesses to the users. Let me explain the "how" and "why" this works in one sentence. And please quote the hell out of me.
"The business is a user."
You all have a Facebook account, most of you have a Twitter account, even some of you use StumbleUpon (in the "correct" way) and you know what they are for and how to use them. It is NO different if you are doing it from the perspective of a giant corporation. That is why it works. Pretend the corporation is a person who talks the same way a person talks. People don't want to connect to big businesses, they want to connect to people who have something interesting to say. The social network presence of the business is then concentrated into one position, one person, one social nerd.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Phase III Wrap-Up #4
Total Activity
I thought this might be an interesting graph for your guys. It shows the daily activity of the 3 sites. As you can see mid-week is usually the high-traffic days (Wednesday and Thursday). It may be more clear by the end of next week, but it is looking good that my hypothesis might be correct. The networks have certainly responded to my increased involvement. See you tomorrow for the start of Phase IV.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Friday, March 27
- Facebook: 1 wall post, 2 event invites
- Twitter: 2 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Twitter is still holding strong, thank goodness and I have been following some extremely interesting Twitterers. ...Twitteri? ...Twats? StumbleUpon is still bust and Facebook remains about the same. Also, you may notice, this is the end of Phase III, so you can expect some graphs to be up soon.
Friday, March 27, 2009
Thursday, March 26
- Facebook: 4 video comments, 3 wall posts, 1 person liked my status
- Twitter: 1 new follower
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Wednesday, March 25
- Facebook: Tagged in 2 videos, 8 comments on videos
- Twitter: 4 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Still no love from StumbleUpon. It might be too early to tell and I won't have a solid answer until the end of Phase IV, but getting subscribers to your interests might take a bit more than reviewing websites and giving thumbs ups. We shall see.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Tuesday, March 24
- Facebook: 1 person liked my status
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
I attended an extremely interesting talk last night hosted by the MIT Enterprise Forum of Chicago about Promoting Your Business Using Web 2.0. Moderated by Flashpoint CEO (my boss) Howard Tullman and featuring panelists Jason Fried, founder of 37signals.com and Harper Reed, CTO for Threadless.com. In short, Twitter is a hell of a resource, Digg has become an unusable joke, and as, always, CONTENT MATTERS! "It helps that we have something to sell." Unlike far too many social network possibilities in which all revenue comes from ads. The panelists discussed how using Web 2.0 content can revolutionize traditional eCommerce firms.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Monday, March 23
- Facebook: 1 wall post
- Twitter: 1 new follower
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Now, brave audience(?) you have nothing to fear. I will stay diligent with my plan.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Phase III
Today marks the beginning of Phase III. Everyday I will be updating my Facebook profile, following three new people on Twitter, sending three tweets, subscribing to three new people on StumbleUpon and reviewing three new websites. Things are picking up after Phase II so lets see what happens when I triple my activity. As always, if anyone would like to suggest ways to better the experiment please comment. Also, looking for followers on this blog, if you are interested.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Friday, March 20
- Facebook: 2 wall posts, 1 new message
- Twitter: 2 new followers
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Thursday, March 19
- Facebook: 3 wall posts, 2 people liked my status, 1 event invite
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Proving once again, that content matters. Telling people what you ate for breakfast over twitter is no match for a solid Yakov Smirnoff line.
Wednesday, March 18
- Facebook: No activity
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: 1 new subscriber
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Tuesday, March 17
- Facebook: 1 event request, 1 other request, 1 new message
- Twitter: no activity
- StumbleUpon: no activity
As well as updating my Facebook profile, I have been diligently tweeting and reviewing websites with StumbleUpon. If you are curious to see what I have been into lately, I both Tweet and Stumble under the name 'shildner'.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Monday, March 16
- Facebook: 1 comment on my status, 1 event invitation
- Twitter: 1 new follower
- StumbleUpon: no activity
On another note; I was stumbling a bit and stumbled on this blog! Someone gave me a thumbs up! I can dig (not digg) that.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Phase II
Today begins Phase II of my little experiment. Every day I will be updating my Facebook profile, following one new person on Twitter, sending one tweet, subscribing to one new person on StumbleUpon, and reviewing one website or blog.
Let's hope we get some people reading this thing. I would love to see some comments on how I can make the experiment more effective.
Let's hope we get some people reading this thing. I would love to see some comments on how I can make the experiment more effective.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Friday, March 13
- Facebook: 1 photo comment
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Well, Phase I is officially over. Not really much internet love (not the dirty kind) this week. I will throw up the stats this weekend and start Phase II on Monday. I hope my imaginary readers have a wonderful weekend. Go drink some green beer!
Friday, March 13, 2009
Thursday, March 12
- Facebook: 1 ad from something called SuperPoke
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Wednesday, March 11
- Facebook: 1 new message, 1 friend request, 1 event invite, 3 comments on photos, and 1 wall post. Woot!
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
Twitter and StumbleUpon are feeling a bit left out, so let's see if next week we can start boosting some of their numbers.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Tuesday, March 10
- Facebook: 1 comment on a photo I was in (the comment was about a Pizza which was also in the picture)
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
I guess I also should mention some other stats that just occurred to me. You may be curious on what my current record is on these sites. I am certainly not new to any of them, but who is?
- Facebook: you don't need to know how many friends I have
- Twitter: following 4 and have 5 followers
- StumbleUpon: 7 subscribers and written 8 reviews
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Monday, March 9
- Facebook: No activity
- Twitter: No activity
- StumbleUpon: No activity
On a side note, I checked the amount of times I have Stumbled and I am clocking in at 30,690! So, I have that going for me.
Check back tomorrow for Tuesday's results.
Friday, March 6, 2009
The Plan
I suppose I should start with the purpose of this thing. Over the next month I will be tracking my internet popularity compared to my involvement in the social network community. Here’s the plan:
After a week of recording my ‘normal’ popularity rate* I will begin Phase 1. Every day I will be updating my Facebook profile, sending one tweet and following one more person on Twitter, and reviewing one website on Stumbleupon. In Phase 2, I step it up to sending three tweets, following three more people and reviewing three websites per day. Facebook will continue to be updated daily. Phase 3 involves sending five tweets per day, following five more people on Twitter and reviewing five more websites for Stumbleupon.
This blog will be updated daily as well and I will provide a weekly wrap-up after each phase. (Expect graphs)
Please feel free to stumble and/or tweet the heck out of me and this blog, but while I appreciate your Facebook friend requests, I probably will not accept unless I have at least shaken your hand.
Enjoy!
After a week of recording my ‘normal’ popularity rate* I will begin Phase 1. Every day I will be updating my Facebook profile, sending one tweet and following one more person on Twitter, and reviewing one website on Stumbleupon. In Phase 2, I step it up to sending three tweets, following three more people and reviewing three websites per day. Facebook will continue to be updated daily. Phase 3 involves sending five tweets per day, following five more people on Twitter and reviewing five more websites for Stumbleupon.
This blog will be updated daily as well and I will provide a weekly wrap-up after each phase. (Expect graphs)
Please feel free to stumble and/or tweet the heck out of me and this blog, but while I appreciate your Facebook friend requests, I probably will not accept unless I have at least shaken your hand.
Enjoy!
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Countdown
Here is the plan:
- March 9th - Blog is active, I will post the "business plan," and the control week will be recorded. This week, I will not be taking any steps to promote my popularity and should provide a good representation of my unaltered internet presence.
- March 16th - The experiment begins. I will be posting daily updates on my progress and expect a weekly wrap-up at the end of each week.
- April 12th - The experiment ends and a final analysis will be given.
Labels:
first post,
marketing,
plan,
web 2.0
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)